Hit a wall where making one thing better makes another worse? Describe the system and the problem in plain language. TIPS works the contradiction through the full TRIZ method and returns scored, non-obvious concepts — each traced to the inventive logic that produced it. No TRIZ expertise required.
TIPS is in private beta. Request access and we'll be in touch.
State your system and the undesired effect in plain language. No TRIZ vocabulary needed — a sentence is enough.
"A bracket strong enough to carry the load is too heavy."
It frames the engineering contradiction, looks up the right inventive principles in the deterministic TRIZ matrix, and generates concrete, context-specific concepts.
Contradiction Matrix · 40 Principles · Su-Field Standards · Separation
Every concept is scored and traced back to the principle, contradiction, and problem that produced it. Pick the strong ones; take them to a prototype or a patent review.
Concept → Principle → Contradiction → Problem
Run a quick contradiction resolution, or the full TRIZ toolkit when the problem — or the patent — demands it.
Pricing is being finalized. Early-access users get free solves during the beta — contact info@neuronkite.com
TIPS runs the systematic TRIZ method, not open-ended ideation. It identifies the actual engineering contradiction in your problem, looks up the inventive principles proven to resolve that class of conflict in the deterministic Contradiction Matrix, and only then uses AI to turn those principles into concrete ideas for your system. Brainstorming gives you many ideas; TIPS gives you the right inventive directions, with the reasoning attached to each one.
The full TRIZ knowledge base — the 39 engineering parameters, the 39×39 Contradiction Matrix, the 40 Inventive Principles, the 76 Su-Field Standard Solutions, the four Separation Principles, and the Trends of Engineering System Evolution — ships as versioned, structured data. The matrix and principles are looked up by deterministic functions, never generated from a model's memory, so the method is applied exactly and the same problem yields the same inventive path.
No. You describe your system and the undesired effect in plain language. TIPS does the parameter mapping, contradiction formulation, and principle selection. Every TRIZ term in the result is paired with a one-line plain-language explanation.
Every solution concept carries its full lineage — concept → inventive principle (or Su-Field standard / separation strategy) → contradiction → problem — as an explorable graph. Nothing is a black-box suggestion; you can audit exactly why each idea was proposed, which is what makes the output usable in a design review or a patent filing.
A fast solve resolves the contradiction directly — Matrix lookup, separation strategies, and Su-Field standards — and returns scored concepts in minutes. A deep solve adds a function model and root-cause chain up front, and an evolution forecast (the Trends of Engineering System Evolution) afterward — for harder problems and for patenting ahead of a system's next generation.
TIPS is in private beta. Request early access and we'll be in touch as we open it up. Pricing is being finalized; beta users get free solves.
Yes. TIPS is API-first: submit a problem, poll for status, and fetch the full solution dossier and lineage programmatically. The dashboard is one client over the same service. Both API key and OIDC authentication are supported.
Yes. Each account operates in full tenant isolation — your problems and the concepts TIPS generates are never shared across accounts. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest.
TIPS is opening to a small group of engineering teams. Tell us what you're working on and we'll get you in.